4.5 Article

Increased methylmercury toxicity related to obesity in diabetic KK-Ay mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 914-923

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jat.2954

关键词

Methylmercury; Diabetes; Obesity; Neurotoxicity; CD204

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [23659340]
  2. National Institute for Minamata Disease
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23510085, 23659340] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the toxic effects of methylmercury (MeHg) in KK-Ay type 2 diabetic mice to clarify how metabolic changes associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus affect MeHg toxicity. MeHg (5 mg Hg kg(-1)day(-1) p.o.) was given to 4-week- old male KK-Ay and C57BL/6J (BL/6) mice three times per week for 6 weeks. Average body weights (BW) of vehicle-treated BL/6 and KK-Ay mice were 16.3 and 16.4 g respectively on the first day, and 24.8 and 42.3 g respectively on the last day of the experiment. MeHg-treated KK-Ay mice began to lose weight about 5 weeks after MeHg administration. Six of seven MeHg-treated KK-Ay mice showed hind-limb clasping in the final stage of the experiment. The mean blood mercury level of MeHg-treated KK-Ay mice reached a maximum of 9.8 mu g ml(-1), whereas that of the MeHg-treated BL/6 mice was 2.8 mu g ml(-1) after 10 days of treatment. The average total mercury concentrations in the cerebrum and epididymal fat pad were 7.4 and 0.57 mu g g(-1), respectively, for BL/6 mice and 27 and 1.6 mu g g(-1), respectively, for KK-Ay mice. In MeHg-treated KK-Ay mice with neurological symptoms, CD204-positive macrophages were observed in the brain, kidney and spleen, indicating CD204 could be a marker for injured tissues. BW loss and significant pathological changes were not observed in other groups of mice. These results indicate that body fat gain in type 2 diabetes mellitus and low mercury accumulation in adipose tissue increased MeHg concentrations in organs and enhanced toxicity in KK-Ay mice at the same dose of MeHg per BW. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据