4.7 Article

Psychiatric genome-wide association study analyses implicate neuronal, immune and histone pathways

期刊

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 199-209

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3922

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London
  2. Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  3. King's College London
  4. US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [K99MH101367]
  5. NIMH [U01 MH085520]
  6. Netherlands Scientific Organization (NOW) [480-05-003]
  7. Dutch Brain Foundation
  8. VU University
  9. MRC [G0800509, G0300189, G1000708] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Lundbeck Foundation [R155-2014-1724] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Medical Research Council [MR/L010305/1, G9817803B, G0300189, G0800509] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of psychiatric disorders have identified multiple genetic associations with such disorders, but better methods are needed to derive the underlying biological mechanisms that these signals indicate. We sought to identify biological pathways in GWAS data from over 60,000 participants from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. We developed an analysis framework to rank pathways that requires only summary statistics. We combined this score across disorders to find common pathways across three adult psychiatric disorders: schizophrenia, major depression and bipolar disorder. Histone methylation processes showed the strongest association, and we also found statistically significant evidence for associations with multiple immune and neuronal signaling pathways and with the postsynaptic density. Our study indicates that risk variants for psychiatric disorders aggregate in particular biological pathways and that these pathways are frequently shared between disorders. Our results confirm known mechanisms and suggest several novel insights into the etiology of psychiatric disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据