4.3 Article

Detection of alpine tree line change with high spatial resolution remotely sensed data

期刊

出版社

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.7.073520

关键词

alpine tree line; arid region; aerial photography; QuickBird; object-oriented classification; change detection

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB825105]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40971066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined vegetation distribution and tree line change in the Sangong River watershed in the Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China, using aerial photographs from 1962 and 1981 and a QuickBird image from 2006. An object-oriented classification method was used to map vegetation distribution, and the postclassification comparison approach was used to detect vegetation change. The results were linked to digital elevation model data for exploring the relationships between vegetation distribution/expansion and topographic factors. It shows that Schrenkiana is mainly distributed in the region with elevations less than 2,600 m, but its tree line can reach 2,880 m. Sabina is mainly distributed in the region with elevations within 2,600 to 2,900 m, and its highest elevation can be 3,270 m. Approximately 73% of Schrenkiana areas are distributed in aspects of 0 to 45 deg and 270 to 360 deg and 52% of Sabina areas are in aspects of 45 to 90 deg and 225 to 270 deg. The Schrenkiana expansion is mainly distributed in slopes of 20 to 40 deg (accounting for 82%) and aspects of 0 to 90 deg and 270 to 315 deg (accounting for 77%). The elevation of Schrenkiana tree lines increased by 2 to 3 m from 1962 to 2006 and of Sabina increased by 7 to 12 m from 1981 to 2006. Both Schrenkiana and Sabina expansion is mainly located in vegetation frontiers. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据