4.8 Article

Functional cortical neurons and astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells in 3D culture

期刊

NATURE METHODS
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 671-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMETH.3415

关键词

-

资金

  1. NARSAD Young Investigator Award (Behavioral and Brain Foundation)
  2. US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [1R01MH100900, 1R01MH100900-02S1]
  3. Stanford University
  4. NIMH [R01 MH099555-03, T32GM007365, F30MH106261, 5R37 MH060233, 5R01 MH094714]
  5. Bio-X Predoctoral Fellowship
  6. NIH [R01NS075252, R21MH099797, R01NS092474]
  7. DGIST R&D Program of the Korean Ministry of Science and ICT & Future Planning [14-BD-16]
  8. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [15-BD-06] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human cerebral cortex develops through an elaborate succession of cellular events that, when disrupted, can lead to neuropsychiatric disease. The ability to reprogram somatic cells into pluripotent cells that can be differentiated in vitro provides a unique opportunity to study normal and abnormal corticogenesis. Here, we present a simple and reproducible 3D culture approach for generating a laminated cerebral cortex-like structure, named human cortical spheroids (hCSs), from pluripotent stem cells. hCSs contain neurons from both deep and superficial cortical layers and map transcriptionally to in vivo fetal development. These neurons are electrophysiologically mature, display spontaneous activity, are surrounded by nonreactive astrocytes and form functional synapses. Experiments in acute hCS slices demonstrate that cortical neurons participate in network activity and produce complex synaptic events. These 3D cultures should allow a detailed interrogation of human cortical development, function and disease, and may prove a versatile platform for generating other neuronal and glial subtypes in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据