4.6 Article

Effect of triphenyl phosphate flame retardant on properties of arylamine-based polybenzoxazines

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 130, 期 2, 页码 1074-1083

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.39248

关键词

flame retardance; resins; thermal properties; thermosets

资金

  1. National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand [P-12-00292]
  2. Rachadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund Part of the Strengthen Chula's Researcher, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  3. Integrated Innovation Academic Center: IIAC Chulalongkorn University Centenary Academic Development Project Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand [CU-56-AM07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three types of arylamine-based benzoxazine resins modified with both condensed-phase and gas-phase action flame retardant, i.e. triphenyl phosphate (TPP) at various weight ratios were investigated. From rheological study, it was found that the viscosity of benzoxazines/TPP mixtures were significantly lower than that of the neat benzoxazine monomers suggesting flow property enhancement. Furthermore, differential scanning calorimetry results revealed that the onset and the maximum temperatures of the exothermic peak, due to the ring opening polymerization of benzoxazine resins, shifted to lower temperatures with increasing TPP. In addition, all polybenzoxazines possessed relatively high char yield, which increased as the TPP content increased thus enhancing their flame retardancy. The limiting oxygen index values of the flame retarded polybenzoxazines also increased with TPP addition. The maximum flame retardancy of UL94 V-0 class was obtained with an addition of only few percents of TPP in the polybenzoxazines. Flexural strength, flexural modulus, and glass transition temperature of those polybenzoxazines tended to decrease with an addition of TPP mainly due to its plasticizing effect. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 1074-1083, 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据