4.6 Article

Influence of Chemical Treatment on the Properties of Banana Stem Fiber and Banana Stem Fiber/Coir Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Maleic Anhydride Grafted Polypropylene/Low-Density Polyethylene Composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 128, 期 2, 页码 1020-1029

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/APP.38197

关键词

biofibers; composites; morphology; mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Banana stem fiber (BSF) reinforced low-density polyethylene (PE) composites were prepared with a hot-press molding machine in the presence of maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (MAPP). To achieve better mechanical properties, the fiber was chemically modified by bleaching, alkalization, and acetylation. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the untreated and treated BSF composites were found to increase with increasing fiber loading up to 20%, whereas the maximum Charpy impact strength (IS) and flexural strength (FS) values were seen at 10% fiber loading; these values decreased thereafter. The Young's modulus (YM) values of the BSF composites increased sharply with fiber loading. All of the treated fibers exhibited better mechanical properties than the untreated ones. The acetylated fiber showed higher UTS (44 MPa), FS (50 MPa), and IS (12.5 j/m(2)) values than the other treated and untreated fibers. The improvements in the mechanical properties of the treated composites were further supported by scanning electron microscopy images of the fracture surfaces. The thermal stabilities of the composites were studied by means of thermogravimetry, differential thermogravimetry, and differential thermal analysis measurements. Hybrid composites composed of BSF (10 wt %), coir fiber (5 wt %), and a MAPP/ low-density PE matrix were prepared. Significant improvements in UTS, YM, FS, and IS were seen in the hybrid composites containing surface-modified BSF. The effects of BSF composition on the composite properties were also studied. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 128:1020-1029, 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据