4.6 Article

Improvement in toughness and heat resistance of poly(lactic acid)/polycarbonate blend through twin-screw blending: Influence of compatibilizer type

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 E402-E412

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.36920

关键词

polymer blends; melt processing; poly(lactic acid); polycarbonate; compatibilizer; toughness; heat deflection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermal mechanical properties and morphological changes of modified poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and polycarbonate (PC) polymer blends based on the equal weight fraction of each component were investigated. Several blend samples were prepared by melt processing with a twin screw extruder using both poly(butylene succinate-co-lactate) (PBSL) and epoxy (EP) as compatibilizers for the PLA/PC binary system. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of PLA/PBSL and PC/PBSL binary blends showed that individual components were immiscible. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of these blends revealed the domain size of PBSL was similar to 0.51 mu m in PLA/PBSL blend, and reduced to around 0.1 mu m in PC/PBSL blend. The notched Izod impact strength (IS) of PLA/PC/PBSL ternary blends increased with PBSL content up to 10 phr PBSL due to enhanced interfacial interaction and proper domain size of the dispersed phase on the basis of DMA, DSC, and SEM analysis. The heat deflection temperature (HDT) showed a maximum at 5 phr PBSL, and it dropped with increasing PBSL content which is a ductile polymer. However, the HDT of PLA/PC/EP ternary blends increased considerably with 10 phr EP due to rigid interphase formation, and it increased further with 1 phr quaternary amine catalyst, however, the IS dropped nearly the same as that of unmodified PLA/PC blend. To take advantage of the two compatibilizers, PBSL and EP were added to the PLA/PC blend at 10 phr each plus 1 phr catalyst and both IS and HDT were improved significantly over unmodified PLA/PC pair. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据