4.6 Article

Monophosphorylation of cornstarch to improve its sizing properties for heat-sensitive wool yarns at reduced temperature

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 127, 期 1, 页码 127-135

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/app.37845

关键词

modified starch; warp sizing agent; phosphorylation; wool yarn; sizing temperature

资金

  1. Open Research Foundation of Anhui Key Laboratory of Textile Materials'' [2006F2003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercial cornstarch was mono-phosphorylated to different levels of substitution in order to investigate the effect of phosphorylation on the properties of cornstarch for sizing heat-sensitive wool yarns at reduced temperature. The influences of starch phosphorylation and sizing temperature upon apparent viscosity and viscosity stability of cooked starch paste, starch retrogradation, adhesion to wool fibers, performance of starch film, aerobic biodegradation, mechanical properties, and hairiness of sized wool yarns were evaluated. The phosphorylation level was varied from 0.021 to 0.082 in degree of substitution (DS), while the temperature considered was from 60 to 95 degrees C. It was found that mono-phosphorylation of starch resulted in enhanced paste stability, reduced retrogradation, strong adhesion to wool fibers, increased performances of starch film, improved mechanical properties of sized wool yarns, and decreased hairiness on surface of sized yarns even if paste temperature was lowered to 60 degrees C. Initially increasing phosphorylation level enhanced positive effects, but excessively increasing the level was not applicable due to marked reduction in tensile strength of starch film. The phosphorylation with a DS value of 0.061 could improve the performances of cornstarch for sizing wool yarns at 60-80 degrees C. Moreover, measurement on BOD5/COD ratios demonstrated that the phosphorylation did not impede aerobic biodegradation of starch. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据