4.6 Article

Synthesis and characterization of novel aromatic polyamides via Yamazaki-Higashi phosphorylation method

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 126, 期 1, 页码 244-252

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/app.36979

关键词

phosphorylation reaction; aromatic polyamide

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [50973062]
  2. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We synthesized four aromatic diacids: 1,3-bis(3-carboxyphenoxy)benzene, 1,4-bis(4-carboxyphenoxy)benzene, 1,4-bis(3-carboxyphenoxy) benzene, and 1,3-bis(4-carboxyphenoxy)benzene, following a procedure of a previously reported synthesis (Ueda and Komatsu, J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 1989, 27, 1017). These diacids were condensed directly with aromatic diamines 4,4'-oxydianiline (ODA), via the YamazakiHigashi phosphorylation method in the presence of triphenylphosphite (TPP), pyridine (Py) and halide salts to give high molecular aromatic polyamides (PAs). The synthesized PAs were obtained in quantitative yields with inherent viscosities between 0.5 and 1.0 dL g-1. The structures and properties of the obtained PAs were characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), polarizing optical microscope (POM). Four PAs all showed good solubility in polar solvents, such as dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc), N-dimethylformamide (DMF), 1-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), and so on. The obtained polymers showed high thermal stability with decomposition temperature around 400 degrees C. The polyamide membranes manifest excellent mechanical properties, with Young's modulus of 2.55.5 GPa. Interestingly, the film of PA-1, PA-2, and PA-3 is completely transparent in the visible range, while PA-4 film is opaque. Crystallization was observed in PA-4 film, although the molecular structure of PA-4 is not as symmetrical as PA-2. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据