4.6 Article

Simulations of a full three-dimensional packing process and flow-induced stresses in injection molding

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 126, 期 5, 页码 1532-1545

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.36648

关键词

injection molding; stress; simulations

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [2012CB025903, 10871159]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerical investigations of a full three-dimensional (3D) packing process and flow-induced stresses are presented. The model was constructed on the basis of a 3D nonisothermal weakly compressible viscoelastic flow model combined with extended pom-pom (XPP) constitutive and Tait state equations. A hybrid finite element method (FEM)finite volume method (FVM) is proposed for solving this model. The momentum equations were solved by the FEM, in which a discrete elastic viscous stress split scheme was used to overcome the elastic stress instability, and an implicit scheme of iterative weakly compressible CrankNicolson-based split scheme was used to avoid the LadyshenskayaBabuska Brezzi condition. The energy and XPP equations were solved by the FVM, in which an upwind scheme was used for the strongly convection-dominated problem of the energy equation. Subsequently, the validity of the proposed method was verified by the benchmark problem, and a full 3D packing process and flow-induced stresses were simulated. The pressure and stresses distributions were studied in the packing process and were in agreement with the results of the literature and experiments in tendency. We particularly focused on the effects of the elasticity and pressure on the flow-induced stresses. The numerical results show that normal stress differences decreased with incremental Weissenberg number and increased with incremental holding pressure. The research results had a certain reference value for improving the properties of products in actual production processes. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据