4.8 Article

Genomic landscape of carcinogen-induced and genetically induced mouse skin squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 946-954

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.3878

关键词

-

资金

  1. Televie
  2. EMBO long-term fellowship
  3. Hercules Foundation
  4. Flemish Government, Department of Economy, Science and Innovation (EWI)
  5. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS)
  6. Interuniversity Attraction Program (PAT)
  7. Fondation Contre le Cancer/Stichting tegen Kanker
  8. Fondation ULB
  9. Fond Yvonne Boel
  10. Fond Gaston Ithier
  11. Baillet Latour Foundation
  12. European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mouse models of cancers are routinely used to study cancer biology. However, it remains unclear whether carcinogenesis in mice is driven by the same spectrum of genomic alterations found in humans. Here we conducted a comprehensive genomic analysis of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene (DMBA)-induced skin cancer, the most commonly used skin cancer model, which appears as benign papillomas that progress into squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). We also studied genetically induced SCCs that expressed G12D mutant Kras (Kras G12D) but were deficient for p53. Using whole-exome sequencing, we uncovered a characteristic mutational signature of DMBA-induced SCCs. We found that the vast majority of DMBA-induced SCCs presented recurrent mutations in Hras, Kras or Rras2 and mutations in several additional putative oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes. Similar genes were recurrently mutated in mouse and human SCCs that were from different organs or had been exposed to different carcinogens. Invasive SCCs, but not papillomas, presented substantial chromosomal aberrations, especially in DMBA-induced and genetically induced Trp53-mutated SCCs. Metastasis occurred through sequential spreading, with relatively few additional genetic events. This study provides a framework for future functional cancer genomic studies in mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据