4.6 Article

Poly(ethyl glycol) Assisting Water Sorption Enhancement of Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend for Drug Delivery

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 122, 期 4, 页码 2309-2316

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/app.34382

关键词

poly(epsilon-caprolactone); poly(ethyl glycol); blend; water sorption; drug release; improvement

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of Xiamen [3502Z20104016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) has been thermally synthesized, and then fractionated to blend with poly(ethyl glycol) (PEG). Blend films of PCL and PEG have been prepared by solution casting. Fourier transform infrared spectrum and differential scanning calorimetry of the films have been carried out, and the results indicate some hydrogen bonding interaction between the two components, which is resulted from the carbonyl groups of PCL and the hydroxyl end-groups of the low-molecular-weight PEG. Scanning electron microscope images of the blend films reveal porous network structures for their surfaces and for their inner parts and the porous structure becomes more pronounced with the increase of PEG in the blend film. Ibuprofen (IBU) was used as the model drug to test the drug release behavior for the PCL/PEG blend matrices. The results show that IBU could be released from the blend tablets rapidly, and the release rate increases with PEG content. Analysis of the release profiles indicates PCL erosion control release mechanism of pure PCL tablet, but drug diffusion control of the blend tablet, because PEG can absorb water to allow water feasible to diffuse into drug core and dissolve drug. Therefore, the interconnected channels in the blend matrices and the hydrophilic nature of PEG contribute to the improvement of the IBU release rate. The research indicates that drug release rate from PCL based material could be efficiently improved by addition of small amount of hydrophilic low-molecular-weight PEG. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 122: 2309-2316, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据