4.6 Article

Impact of Injection-Molding Processing Parameters on the Electrical, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of Thermoplastic/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 120, 期 1, 页码 70-78

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/app.32983

关键词

injection molding; nanocomposites; thermoplastics

资金

  1. Irving and Cherna Moskowitz Center for Nano and Bio-Nano Imaging at the Weizmann Institute of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermoplastic nanocomposites, based on high-density polyethylene, polyamide 6, polyamide 66, poly(butylene terephthalate), or polycarbonate and containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs), were compounded with either neat CNTs or commercial CNT master batches and injection-molded for the evaluation of their electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties. The nanocomposites reached a percolation threshold within CNT concentrations of 2-5 wt %; however, the mechanical properties of the host polymers were affected. For some nanocomposites, better properties were achieved with neat CNTs, whereas for others, master batches were better. Then, polycarbonate and poly(butylene terephthalate), both with a CNT concentration of 3 wt %, were injection-molded with a screening design of experiments (DOE) to evaluate the effects of the processing parameters on the properties of the nanocomposites. Although only a 10-run screening DOE was performed, such effects were clearly observed. The volume resistivity was significantly dependent on the working temperature and varied up to 4 orders of magnitude. Other properties were also dependent on the processing parameters, albeit in a less pronounced fashion. Transmission electron microscopy indicated that conductive samples formed a percolation network, whereas nonconductive samples did not. In conclusion, injection-molding parameters have a significant impact on the properties of polymer/CNT nanocomposites, and these parameters should be optimized to yield the best results. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 120: 70-78, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据