4.8 Article

Anisotropic nanoparticle complementarity in DNA-mediated co-crystallization

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 833-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT4293

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) [FA9550-11-1-0275]
  2. Department of Defense National Security Science and Engineering Faculty Fellowship (NSSEFF) award [N00014-15-1-0043]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) Materials Research Science and Engineering Center program at Materials Research Center of Northwestern University [DMR-1121262]
  4. Non-equilibrium Energy Research Center (NERC) an Energy Frontier Research Center - Department of Energy (DoE), Office of Science, and Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0000989]
  5. NSF
  6. DoE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  7. MRSEC programme of National Science Foundation [NSC DMR-1121262]
  8. Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center of National Science Foundation [EEC-0118025/003]
  9. State of Illinois
  10. Northwestern University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whether two species will co-crystallize depends on the chemical, physical and structural complementarity of the interacting components. Here, by using DNA as a surface ligand, we selectively co-crystallize mixtures of two different anisotropic nanoparticles and systematically investigate the effects of nanoparticle size and shape complementarity on the resultant crystal symmetry, microstrain, and effective 'DNA bond' length and strength. We then use these results to understand a more complicated system where both size and shape complementarity change, and where one nanoparticle can participate in multiple types of directional interactions. Our findings offer improved control of non-spherical nanoparticles as building blocks for the assembly of sophisticated macroscopic materials, and provide a framework to understand complementarity and directional interactions in DNA-mediated nanoparticle crystallization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据