4.6 Article

The Influence of Cross-Linking Reaction on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Polyarylene Ether Nitrile

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 120, 期 3, 页码 1822-1828

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/app.33399

关键词

films; high performance polymers; cross-linking; mechanical properties; thermal properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The processing of cross-linked polyarylene ether nitrile (PEN), which has a triazine rings structure, has been investigated under different reaction times and temperatures. In this study, the PEN films prepared by the tape-casting formed the thermally stable triazine rings by catalytic cross-linking reaction gradually, which was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The chemical cross-linking reaction occurred as the CN group absorption of PEN at 2221 cm(-1) decreased and a new absorption peak, at 1682 cm(-1), was observed, and the absorption peak intensity would be progressively larger, with the extension of the processing time. After the formation of cross-linking networks, the cross-linking degree and thermal and mechanical properties of the processed films were improved substantially, compared with the untreated films. The film with added ZnCl2 as the catalyst was more rapidly cross-linked, and its properties were better than that without catalyst at the same treatment conditions. The glass-transition temperature (T-g) of PEN films processed at 350 degrees C for 4 h (213.65 degrees C) was higher than that of PEN films before the treatment (161 degrees C), and the tensile strength was also improved significantly. The PEN was processed at 350 degrees C for 2 h, whose initial decomposition temperature increases by about 10 degrees C, compared with that of untreated film, at one time. The rheology behavior of the cross-linked films was processed on dynamic rheometer to monitor and track the process of polymer cross-linking reaction. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 120: 1822-1828, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据