4.8 Article

Enhancement of low-energy electron emission in 2D radioactive films

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 904-907

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT4323

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0844343/CHE-1412402]
  2. Division of Chemical Sciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Condensed Phase and Interfacial Molecular Science Program, US Department of Energy [FG02-10ER16170]
  3. European Research Council under the European Union/ERC [616121]
  4. Royal Society through a Wolfson Research merit Award
  5. EPSRC [EP/F013612/1, EP/L000202/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L000202/1, EP/F013612/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Division Of Chemistry
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1412402] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-energy radiation has been used for decades; however, the role of low-energy electrons created during irradiation has only recently begun to be appreciated(1,2). Low-energy electrons are the most important component of radiation damage in biological environments because they have subcellular ranges, interact destructively with chemical bonds, and are the most abundant product of ionizing particles in tissue. However, methods for generating them locally without external stimulation do not exist. Here, we synthesize one-atom-thick films of the radioactive isotope I-125 on gold that are stable under ambient conditions. Scanning tunnelling microscopy, supported by electronic structure simulations, allows us to directly observe nuclear transmutation of individual I-125 atoms into Te-125, and explain the surprising stability of the 2D film as it underwent radioactive decay. The metal interface geometry induces a 600% amplification of low-energy electron emission (<10 eV; ref. 3) compared with atomic I-125. This enhancement of biologically active low-energy electrons might offer a new direction for highly targeted nanoparticle therapies(4-6).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据