4.6 Article

Production of Filled Hydrogels by Mechanochemically Induced Polymerization

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 120, 期 2, 页码 799-807

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.33102

关键词

composites; hydrophilic polymers; silicas; swelling

资金

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silica nanoparticles functionalized with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) were obtained by the grinding/mechanical activation of quartz or nonfunctionalized silica nanoparticles in a stirred media mill in the presence of 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone, as proven by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The polymer layer thickness formed on the silica nanoparticles after 8 h of mechanical activation in the absence of polymerization initiators amounted to about 10 nm, as derived from shear rheology. The silica nanoparticles functionalized with the hydrophilic PVP by mechanochemical polymerization reaction were used as fillers for hydrogels based on poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (polyHEMA). The water absorption, release properties, and mechanical properties of the polyHEMA-silica composites were measured as functions of the filler content and particle size of the filler. PolyHEMA samples containing 20 wt % of the functionalized silica particles exhibited a higher maximum water absorption than the unfilled polymer; this showed that the hydrophilic interface between the filler and the matrix improved the water absorption. The release of methylene blue from the poly-HEMA-silica composites was governed by diffusion and was almost unaffected by the silica particles. The values for the storage modulus and loss modulus of the poly-HEMA silica composites increased with growing filler content. For constant filler content, the storage modulus increased with decreasing particle diameter of the filler; this showed that the reinforcing effect increased with the interface between the filler particles and the matrix polymer. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 120: 799-807, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据