4.6 Article

Electrohydrodynamic Liquid Atomization of Biodegradable Polymer Microparticles: Effect of Electrohydrodynamic Liquid Atomization Variables on Microparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 526-534

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.30107

关键词

biocompatibility; biodegradable; biomaterials; biopolymers; particle size distribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exploration of a method to tailor a biodegradable polymer into microparticles/nanoparticles with a desirable morphology and size may result in their enhanced performance as biomedical devices for drug delivery and simplify the preparation process. A modified electrohydrodynamic liquid atomization (EHDA) process is reported here for the preparation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microparticles. To understand systematically the EHDA method for the preparation of PLGA microparticles, PLGAs of four different molecular weights were electrosprayed under different conditions involving changes in the applied potential, liquid flow rate, polymer concentration, and solvent. The results show that the right concentration range of PLGA is key for electrospraying the spherical particles. A solution with a low-molecular-weight PLGA has a wider concentration range for electrospraying into spherical particles than a solution with a high-molecular weight PLGA. At the concentration at which spherical particles are formed, the diameter of the as-sprayed particles is not affected substantially by the applied potential and PLGA molecular weight, but it increases monotonically with the liquid flow rate and PLGA concentration. Experimentation further demonstrated that low electric conductivity, a low dielectric constant, and a high vapor pressure of chloroform are favorable for controlling the EHDA process solvent N,N-dimethylformamide with opposite solvent properties and, at the same time, produces smaller and poly-disperse particles. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 113: 526-534, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据