4.5 Article

Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase: mechanism of action and role in regulating oxidative phosphorylation

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 117, 期 12, 页码 1431-1439

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00737.2014

关键词

oxidative phosphorylation; cytochrome oxidase; energy coupling; respiratory control; mechanism; model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation has a central role in eukaryotic metabolism, providing the energy (ATP) required for survival. Regulation of this important pathway is, however, still not understood, largely due to limitations in the ability to measure the essential metabolites, including oxygen (pO(2), oxygen pressure), ADP, and AMP. In addition, neither the mechanism of oxygen reduction by mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase nor how its rate is controlled is understood, although this enzyme determines the rate of oxygen consumption and thereby the rate of ATP synthesis. Cytochrome c oxidase is responsible for reduction of molecular oxygen to water using reducing equivalents donated by cytochrome c and for site 3 energy coupling in oxidative phosphorylation. A mechanism-based model of the cytochrome c oxidase reaction is presented in which transfer of reducing equivalents from the lower-to the higher-potential region of the coupling site occurs against an opposing energy barrier, Q. The steady-state rate equation is fitted to data for the dependence of mitochondrial respiratory rate on cytochrome c reduction, oxygen pressure (pO(2)), and [ATP]/[ADP][Pi] at pH 6.5 to 8.35 (where Pi is inorganic phosphate). The fit of the rate expression to the experimental data is very good for all experimental conditions. Levels of the intermediates in oxygen reduction in the oxidase reaction site have been calculated. An intermediate in the reaction, tentatively identified as peroxide, bridged between the iron and copper atoms of the reaction site has a central role in coupling mitochondrial respiration to the [ATP]/[ADP][Pi].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据