4.5 Article

A simplified method for determining phenotypic traits in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 114, 期 7, 页码 911-922

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00747.2012

关键词

pathophysiology of sleep apnea; loop gain; pharyngeal critical closing pressure; upper airway; arousal threshold

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [5R01 HL-048531-16, R01 HL-085188, R01 HL-090897, R01 HL-102321, K24-HL-093218, P01 HL-095491]
  2. American Heart Association [0840159N, 0575028N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simplified method for determining phenotypic traits in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol 114: 911-922, 2013. First published January 24, 2013; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00747.2012.-We previously published a method for measuring several physiological traits causing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The method, however, had a relatively low success rate (76%) and required mathematical modeling, potentially limiting its application. This paper presents a substantial revision of that technique. To make the measurements, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was manipulated during sleep to quantify 1) eupneic ventilatory demand, 2) the level of ventilation at which arousals begin to occur, 3) ventilation off CPAP (nasal pressure = 0 cmH(2)O) when the pharyngeal muscles are activated during sleep, and 4) ventilation off CPAP when the pharyngeal muscles are relatively passive. These traits could be determined in all 13 participants (100% success rate). There was substantial intersubject variability in the reduction in ventilation that individuals could tolerate before having arousals (difference between ventilations #1 and #2 ranged from 0.7 to 2.9 liters/min) and in the amount of ventilatory compensation that individuals could generate (difference between ventilations #3 and #4 ranged from -0.5 to 5.5 liters/min). Importantly, the measurements accurately reflected clinical metrics; the difference between ventilations #2 and #3, a measure of the gap that must be overcome to achieve stable breathing during sleep, correlated with the apnea-hypopnea index (r = 0.9, P < 0.001). An additional procedure was added to the technique to measure loop gain (sensitivity of the ventilatory control system), which allowed arousal threshold and upper airway gain (response of the upper airway to increasing ventilatory drive) to be quantified as well. Of note, the traits were generally repeatable when measured on a second night in 5 individuals. This technique is a relatively simple way of defining mechanisms underlying OSA and could potentially be used in a clinical setting to individualize therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据