4.5 Article

Linking the mechanics and energetics of hopping with elastic ankle exoskeletons

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 113, 期 12, 页码 1862-1872

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00802.2012

关键词

metabolic power; spring-loaded; locomotion; power; EMG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Farris DJ, Sawicki GS. Linking the mechanics and energetics of hopping with elastic ankle exoskeletons. J Appl Physiol 113: 1862-1872, 2012. First published October 11, 2012; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00802.2012.-The springlike mechanics of the human leg during bouncing gaits has inspired the design of passive assistive devices that use springs to aid locomotion. The purpose of this study was to test whether a passive spring-loaded ankle exoskeleton could reduce the mechanical and energetic demands of bilateral hopping on the musculoskeletal system. Joint level kinematics and kinetics were collected with electromyographic and metabolic energy consumption data for seven participants hopping at four frequencies (2.2, 2.5, 2.8, and 3.2 Hz). Hopping was performed without an exoskeleton; with an springless exoskeleton; and with a spring-loaded exoskeleton. Spring-loaded ankle exoskeletons reduced plantar flexor muscle activity and the biological contribution to ankle joint moment (15-25%) and average positive power (20-40%). They also facilitated reductions in metabolic power (15-20%) across frequencies from 2.2 to 2.8 Hz compared with hopping with a springless exoskeleton. Reductions in metabolic power compared with hopping with no exoskeleton were restricted to hopping at 2.5 Hz only (12%). These results highlighted the importance of reducing the rate of muscular force production and work to achieve metabolic reductions. They also highlighted the importance of assisting muscles acting at the knee joint. Exoskeleton designs may need to be tuned to optimize exoskeleton mass, spring stiffness, and spring slack length to achieve greater metabolic reductions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据