4.5 Article

A simple and valid method to determine thermoregulatory sweating threshold and sensitivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 107, 期 1, 页码 69-75

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00250.2009

关键词

thermoregulation; heat stress; exercise; segmented linear regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cheuvront SN, Bearden SE, Kenefick RW, Ely BR, DeGroot DW, Sawka MN, Montain SJ. A simple and valid method to determine thermoregulatory sweating threshold and sensitivity. J Appl Physiol 107: 69-75, 2009. First published May 7, 2009; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00250.2009.-Sweating threshold temperature and sweating sensitivity responses are measured to evaluate thermoregulatory control. However, analytic approaches vary, and no standardized methodology has been validated. This study validated a simple and standardized method, segmented linear regression (SReg), for determination of sweating threshold temperature and sensitivity. Archived data were extracted for analysis from studies in which local arm sweat rate (m(sw); ventilated dew-point temperature sensor) and esophageal temperature (T-es) were measured under a variety of conditions. The relationship m(sw)/T-es from 16 experiments was analyzed by seven experienced raters (Rater), using a variety of empirical methods, and compared against SReg for the determination of sweating threshold temperature and sweating sensitivity values. Individual interrater differences (n = 324 comparisons) and differences between Rater and SReg (n = 110 comparisons) were evaluated within the context of biologically important limits of magnitude (LOM) via a modified Bland-Altman approach. The average Rater and SReg outputs for threshold temperature and sensitivity were compared (n = 16) using inferential statistics. Rater employed a very diverse set of criteria to determine the sweating threshold temperature and sweating sensitivity for the 16 data sets, but interrater differences were within the LOM for 95% (threshold) and 73% (sensitivity) of observations, respectively. Differences between mean Rater and SReg were within the LOM 90% (threshold) and 83% (sensitivity) of the time, respectively. Rater and SReg were not different by conventional t-test (P > 0.05). SReg provides a simple, valid, and standardized way to determine sweating threshold temperature and sweating sensitivity values for thermoregulatory studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据