4.8 Article

Convergent losses of decay mechanisms and rapid turnover of symbiosis genes in mycorrhizal mutualists

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 410-U176

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3223

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, a DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Laboratory of Excellence ARBRE [ANR-11-LABX-0002-01]
  3. Genomic Science Program (Plant-Microbe Interactions project) - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  4. Lorraine Region Council
  5. US National Science Foundation [DEB-1208719, DEB-0933081, DEB-1021606]
  6. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig [DFG FTZ 118]
  7. German Science Foundation (DFG) [BU941/20-1]
  8. Swedish Research Council
  9. Laboratory of Excellence TULIP [ANR-10-LABX-41, ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02]
  10. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences [1021606] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To elucidate the genetic bases of mycorrhizal lifestyle evolution, we sequenced new fungal genomes, including 13 ectomycorrhizal (ECM), orchid (ORM) and ericoid (ERM) species, and five saprotrophs, which we analyzed along with other fungal genomes. Ectomycorrhizal fungi have a reduced complement of genes encoding plant cell wall-degrading enzymes (PCWDEs), as compared to their ancestral wood decayers. Nevertheless, they have retained a unique array of PCWDEs, thus suggesting that they possess diverse abilities to decompose lignocellulose. Similar functional categories of nonorthologous genes are induced in symbiosis. Of induced genes, 7-38% are orphan genes, including genes that encode secreted effector-like proteins. Convergent evolution of the mycorrhizal habit in fungi occurred via the repeated evolution of a 'symbiosis toolkit', with reduced numbers of PCWDEs and lineage-specific suites of mycorrhiza-induced genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据