4.5 Article

Finite element 3D reconstruction of the pulmonary acinus imaged by synchrotron X-ray tomography

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 105, 期 3, 页码 964-976

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90546.2008

关键词

alveolated duct; model; structure; morphometry; morphology

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL-054885, HL-070542, HL-074022]
  2. Serbian Ministry of Science [OI144028, TR12007]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0-109874/1]
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL074002, R01HL054885, R01HL070542, R01HL074022] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The alveolated structure of the pulmonary acinus plays a vital role in gas exchange function. Three-dimensional (3D) analysis of the parenchymal region is fundamental to understanding this structure-function relationship, but only a limited number of attempts have been conducted in the past because of technical limitations. In this study, we developed a new image processing methodology based on finite element (FE) analysis for accurate 3D structural reconstruction of the gas exchange regions of the lung. Stereologically well characterized rat lung samples (Pediatr Res 53: 72-80, 2003) were imaged using high-resolution synchrotron radiation-based X-ray tomographic microscopy. A stack of 1,024 images (each slice: 1024 X 1024 pixels) with resolution of 1.4 mu m(3) per voxel were generated. For the development of FE algorithm, regions of interest (ROI), containing similar to 7.5 million voxels, were further extracted as a working subunit. 3D FEs were created overlaying the voxel map using a grid-based hexahedral algorithm. A proper threshold value for appropriate segmentation was iteratively determined to match the calculated volume density of tissue to the stereologically determined value (Pediatr Res 53: 72-80, 2003). The resulting 3D FEs are ready to be used for 3D structural analysis as well as for subsequent FE computational analyses like fluid dynamics and skeletonization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据