4.5 Article

Influence of priming exercise on pulmonary O2 uptake kinetics during transitions to high-intensity exercise from an elevated baseline

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 105, 期 2, 页码 538-546

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90357.2008

关键词

oxygen uptake kinetics; phase II time constant; oxygen uptake slow component; work-to-work transition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been suggested that the slower O-2 uptake (Vo(2)) kinetics observed when exercise is initiated from an elevated baseline metabolic rate are linked to an impairment of muscle O-2 delivery. We hypothesized that priming exercise would significantly reduce the phase II time constant (tau) during subsequent severe-intensity cycle exercise initiated from an elevated baseline metabolic rate. Seven healthy men completed exercise transitions to 70% of the difference between gas exchange threshold (GET) and peak Vo(2) from a moderate-intensity baseline (90% GET) on three occasions in each of the unprimed and primed conditions. Pulmonary gas exchange, heart rate, and the electromyogram of m. vastus lateralis were measured during all tests. The phase II Vo(2) kinetics were slower when severe exercise was initiated from a baseline of moderate exercise compared with unloaded pedaling (mean +/- SD tau, 42 +/- 15 vs. 33 +/- 8 s; P < 0.05), but were not accelerated by priming exercise (42 +/- 17 s; P > 0.05). The amplitude of the Vo(2) slow component and the change in electromyogram from minutes 2 to 6 were both significantly reduced following priming exercise (Vo(2) slow component: from 0.47 +/- 0.09 to 0.27 +/- 0.13 l/min; change in integrated electromyogram between 2 and 6 min: from 51 +/- 35 to 26 +/- 43% of baseline; P < 0.05 for both comparisons). These results indicate that the slower phase II Vo(2) kinetics observed during transitions to severe exercise from an elevated baseline are not altered by priming exercise, but that the reduced Vo(2) slow component may be linked to changes in muscle fiber activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据