4.5 Article

Of tongue muscle contraction and dynamic airway pressure on velopharyngeal volume in the rat

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 682-693

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01043.2007

关键词

apnea; functional electrical stimulation; hypoglossal nerve; magnetic resonance imaging; pharynx; upper airway

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-68162] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC-07692] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mammalian pharynx is a collapsible tube that narrows during inspiration as transmural pressure becomes negative. The velopharynx (VP), which lies posterior to the soft palate, is considered to be one of the most collapsible pharyngeal regions. I tested the hypothesis that negative transmural pressure would narrow the VP, and that electrical stimulation of extrinsic tongue muscles would reverse this effect. Pressure (-6, -3, 3, and 6 cmH(2)O) was applied to the isolated pharyngeal airway of anesthetized rats that were positioned in a 4.7-T MRI scanner. The volume of eight axial slices encompassing the length of the VP was computed at each level of pressure, with and without bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation (0.1-ms pulse, one-third maximum force, 80 Hz). Negative pressure narrowed the VP, and either whole hypoglossal nerve stimulation (coactivation of protrudor and retractor muscles) or medial nerve branch stimulation (independent activation of tongue protrudor muscles) reversed this effect, with the greatest impact in the caudal one-third of the VP. The dilating effects of medial branch stimulation were slightly larger than whole nerve stimulation. Positive pressure dilated the VP, but tongue muscle contraction did not cause further dilation under these conditions. I conclude that the narrowest and most collapsible segment of the rat pharynx is in the caudal VP, posterior to the tip of the soft palate. Either coactivation of protrudor and retractor muscles or independent contraction of protrudor muscles caused dilation of this region, but the latter was slightly more effective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据