4.6 Article

Effects of non-hydrostaticity and grain size on the pressure-induced phase transition of the CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 124, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5046180

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Thousand Youth Talents Program in China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51871054, U1530402, 51671018, 11790293, 51531001, 51422101, 51371003, 51671021]
  3. 111 Project [B07003]
  4. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2015DFG52600]
  5. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_14R05]
  6. Office of Science, DOE-BES [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  7. National Science Foundation (NSF)-Earth Sciences [EAR-1128799]
  8. Department of Energy (DOE)-GeoSciences [DE-FG02-94ER14466]
  9. COMPRES [EAR 11-57758]
  10. NSF [EAR-1128799]
  11. DOE [DE-FG02-94ER14466]
  12. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, an irreversible polymorphic transition from face-centered cubic to hexagonal close-packing was surprisingly observed under high pressure in the prototype CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloys (HEAs) by various research groups. This unexpected phase transition brings new insights into the stability of HEAs, and its irreversibility stimulates exploration for new HEAs via high-pressure compression synthesis. However, the onset pressure for the phase transition was reported to fluctuate over a vast range from similar to 7 to above 49 GPa in the reported experiments. The reason for this inconsistency remains unclear and puzzles the HEA community. To address this problem, this work systematically investigates the effects of non-hydrostaticity and grain size. Our results demonstrate that larger deviatoric stress induced by the non-hydrostaticity of the pressure medium and larger grain size of the initial sample can both promote a phase transition and, therefore, considerably depress the onset pressure. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据