4.6 Article

Electronic and optical properties of NbO2

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 116, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4903067

关键词

-

资金

  1. SRC [2012-VJ-2299]
  2. Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC)
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1104934]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science by Sandia National Laboratory [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1104934] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we combine theoretical and experimental approaches in order to gain insight into the electronic properties of both the high-temperature, rutile (metallic) and low-temperature, body-centered tetragonal (insulating) phase of niobium dioxide (NbO2) as well as the optical properties of the low-temperature phase. Theoretical calculations performed at the level of the local density approximation, Hubbard U correction, and hybrid functional are complemented with the spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) of epitaxial films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. For the rutile phase, the local density approximation (LDA) gives the best description and predicts Fermi surface nesting consistent with wave vectors that lead to niobium-niobium dimerization during the phase transition. For the insulating phase, LDA provides a good quantitative description of the lattice, but only a qualitative description for the band gap. Including a Hubbard U correction opens the band gap at the expense of correctly describing the valence band and lattice of both phases. The hybrid functional slightly overestimates the band gap. Ellipsometric measurement is consistent with insulating behavior with a 1.0 eV band gap. Comparison with the theoretical dielectric functions, obtained utilizing a scissors operator to adjust the LDA band gap to reproduce the ellipsometry data, allows for identification of the SE peak features. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据