4.6 Article

Metal insulator transitions in perovskite SrIrO3 thin films

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 116, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4903314

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0009231, 2012-R1A1B3000550]
  2. SRC at POSTECH [2011-0030786]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0009231] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding of metal insulator transitions in a strongly correlated system, driven by Anderson localization (disorder) and/or Mott localization (correlation), is a long standing problem in condensed matter physics. The prevailing fundamental question would be how these two mechanisms contrive to accomplish emergent anomalous behaviors. Here, we have grown high quality perovskite SrIrO3 thin films, containing a strong spin orbit coupled 5d element Ir, on various substrates such as GdScO3 (110), DyScO3 (110), SrTiO3 (001), and NdGaO3 (110) with increasing lattice mismatch, in order to carry out a systematic study on the transport properties. We found that metal insulator transitions can be induced in this system; by either reducing thickness (on best lattice matched substrate) or changing degree of lattice strain (by lattice mismatch between film and substrates) of films. Surprisingly these two pathways seek two distinct types of metal insulator transitions; the former falls into disorder driven Anderson type whereas the latter turns out to be of unconventional Mott-Anderson type with the interplay of disorder and correlation. More interestingly, in the metallic phases of SrIrO3, unusual non-Fermi liquid characteristics emerge in resistivity as Delta rho proportional to T-e with e evolving from 4/5 to 1 to 3/2 with increasing lattice strain. We discuss theoretical implications of these phenomena to shed light on the metal insulator transitions. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据