4.6 Article

Complete characterization by Raman spectroscopy of the structural properties of thin hydrogenated diamond-like carbon films exposed to rapid thermal annealing

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 116, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4896838

关键词

-

资金

  1. Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship for Career Development within the 7th European Community Framework Programme [PIOF-GA-2012-328776]
  2. Advanced Storage Technology Consortium ASTC [2011-012]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1107642]
  4. UPenn MRSEC Program of the National Science Foundation [DMR11-20901]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [1107642] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have demonstrated that multi-wavelength Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopies are sufficient to completely characterize the structural properties of ultra-thin hydrogenated diamondlike carbon (DLC: H) films subjected to rapid thermal annealing (RTA, 1 s up to 659 degrees C) and to resolve the structural differences between films grown by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition, facing target sputtering and filtered cathodic vacuum arc with minute variations in values of mass density, hydrogen content, and sp(3) fraction. In order to distinguish unequivocally between films prepared with different density, thickness, and RTA treatment, a new method for analysis of Raman spectra was invented. This newly developed analysis method consisted of plotting the position of the Raman G band of carbon versus its full width at half maximum. Moreover, we studied the passivation of non-radiative recombination centers during RTA by performing measurements of the increase in photoluminescence in conjunction with the analysis of DLC: H networks simulated by molecular dynamics. The results show that dangling bond passivation is primarily a consequence of thermally-induced sp(2) clustering rather than hydrogen diffusion in the film. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据