4.8 Article

The contribution of rare variation to prostate cancer heritability

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 30-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3446

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01 CA165862, U19 CA148537, UM1 CA164973, RC2 CA148085, U01 CA1326792, R21 CA182821, U01 CA188392, CA128978]
  2. European Community [223175]
  3. Cancer Research UK [C1287/A10118, C1287/A 10710, C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014, C5047/A8384, C5047/A15007, C5047/A10692, C8197/A16565]
  4. Post-Cancer GWAS initiative [1U19 CA148537, 1U19 CA148065, 1U19 CA148112]
  5. US Department of Defense [W81XWH-10-1-0341]
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  7. Komen Foundation
  8. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  9. Ovarian Cancer Research Fund
  10. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U19CA148065, R01CA128978, U19CA148112, U19CA148537] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. Cancer Research UK [15007, 16563, 17528] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report targeted sequencing of 63 known prostate cancer risk regions in a multi-ancestry study of 9,237 men and use the data to explore the contribution of low-frequency variation to disease risk. We show that SNPs with minor allele frequencies (MAFs) of 0.1-1% explain a substantial fraction of prostate cancer risk in men of African ancestry. We estimate that these SNPs account for 0.12 (standard error (s.e.) = 0.05) of variance in risk (similar to 42% of the variance contributed by SNPs with MAF of 0.1-50%). This contribution is much larger than the fraction of neutral variation due to SNPs in this class, implying that natural selection has driven down the frequency of many prostate cancer risk alleles; we estimate the coupling between selection and allelic effects at 0.48 (95% confidence interval [0.19, 0.78]) under the Eyre-Walker model. Our results indicate that rare variants make a disproportionate contribution to genetic risk for prostate cancer and suggest the possibility that rare variants may also have an outsize effect on other common traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据