4.6 Article

Structural phase transitions in Ti-doped Bi1-xNdxFeO3 ceramics

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 111, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3697666

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/G005001/1, EP/G069069/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/G069069/1, EP/G005001/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G069069/1, EP/G005001/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, it was demonstrated that donor doping with Ti on the B-site significantly reduces the conductivity in Bi0.85Nd0.15FeO3 ceramics [Kalantari et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3737 (2011)]. In this contribution, the phase transitions as a function of Nd concentration are investigated in 3% Ti doped Bi1-xNdxFeO3 ceramics. Paraelectric (PE) to ferroelectric (FE) transitions were observed for compositions with x <= 0.125 which manifested themselves as peaks in permittivity. In contrast, PE to antiferroelectric (AFE) transitions for 0.15 <= x <= 0.20 gave rise to a step-like change in the permittivity with x = 0.25 exhibiting no sharp anomalies and remaining PE until room temperature. The large volume change at the PE to FE/AFE transitions, reported by Levin and co-workers [Phys. Rev. B 81, 020103 (2011)] and observed here by dilatometry, coupled with their first-order character constrain the transitions to occur uniformly throughout the material in an avalanche-like manner. Hence, the anomalies in DSC, permittivity and thermal expansion occur over a commensurately narrow temperature interval. However, despite the large volume change and eye-catching anomalies in DSC, the latent heats for the transitions in Ti-doped Bi1-xNdxFeO3 are similar to Pb(Zr,Ti)O-3 (1-3 kJ/mol) with each an order of magnitude greater than BaTiO3 (similar to 0.2 kJ/mol). A broad frequency dependent dielectric anomaly of unknown origin in the temperature range 250-450 degrees C was also observed in all samples. (C) 2012 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3697666]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据