4.6 Article

Experimental and theoretical study of polarization-dependent optical transitions in InAs quantum dots at telecommunication-wavelengths (1300-1500 nm)

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 109, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3587167

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S05762/01, EP/H000488/1, EP/C511972/1, EP/F031688/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/H000488/1, EP/F031688/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The design of some optical devices, such as semiconductor optical amplifiers for telecommunication applications, requires polarization-insensitive optical emission at long wavelengths (1300-1550 nm). Self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots (QDs) typically exhibit ground state optical emissions at wavelengths shorter than 1300 nm with highly polarization-sensitive characteristics, although this can be modified by the use of low growth rates, the incorporation of strain-reducing capping layers, or the growth of closely-stacked QD layers. Exploiting the strain interactions between closely stacked QD layers also affords greater freedom in the choice of growth conditions for the upper layers, so that both a significant extension in their emission wavelength and an improved polarization response can be achieved due to modification of the QD size, strain, and composition. In this paper, we investigate the polarization behavior of single and stacked QD layers using room temperature sub-lasing-threshold electroluminescence and photovoltage measurements, as well as atomistic modeling with the NEMO 3-D simulator. A reduction is observed in the ratio of the transverse electric ('TE) to transverse magnetic (TM) optical mode response for a GaAs-capped QD stack as compared to a single QD layer, but when the second layer of the two-layer stack is InGaAs-capped, an increase in the TE/TM ratio is observed, in contrast to recent reports for single QD layers. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3587167]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据