4.8 Article

Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China

期刊

NATURE
卷 524, 期 7565, 页码 335-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature14677

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. China's National Basic Research Program
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [XDA05010109, 2014CB441301, XDA05010110, XDA05010103, XDA05010101, 41328008, 41222036]
  4. Italy's Ministry for Environment, Land and Sea
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L016028]
  6. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  7. European Research Council [ERC-2013-SyG 610028-IMBALANCE-P]
  8. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research under US Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  9. NSFC [41422502, 41175127, 41161140353, 91425303, 41473076]
  10. International Science AMP
  11. Technology Cooperation Program of China [2012DFA91530]
  12. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China [8151002]
  13. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  14. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [TD-JC-2013-2]
  15. China CDM Fund [2013051, 2013124]
  16. Shenyang Science and Technology Planning [F14-232-6-01, F14-134-9-00]
  17. Norwegian Research Council [235523]
  18. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L016028/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  19. ESRC [ES/L016028/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nearly three-quarters of the growth in global carbon emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and cement production between 2010 and 2012 occurred in China(1,2). Yet estimates of Chinese emissions remain subject to large uncertainty; inventories of China's total fossil fuel carbon emissions in 2008 differ by 0.3 gigatonnes of carbon, or 15 per cent(1,3-5). The primary sources of this uncertainty are conflicting estimates of energy consumption and emission factors, the latter being uncertain because of very few actual measurements representative of the mix of Chinese fuels. Here we re-evaluate China's carbon emissions using updated and harmonized energy consumption and clinker production data and two new and comprehensive sets of measured emission factors for Chinese coal. We find that total energy consumption in China was 10 per cent higher in 2000-2012 than the value reported by China's national statistics(6), that emission factors for Chinese coal are on average 40 per cent lower than the default values recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(7), and that emissions from China's cement production are 45 per cent less than recent estimates(1,4). Altogether, our revised estimate of China's CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production is 2.49 gigatonnes of carbon (2 standard deviations = +/-7.3 per cent) in 2013, which is 14 per cent lower than the emissions reported by other prominent inventories(1,4,8). Over the full period 2000 to 2013, our revised estimates are 2.9 gigatonnes of carbon less than previous estimates of China's cumulative carbon emissions(1,4). Our findings suggest that overestimation of China's emissions in 2000-2013 may be larger than China's estimated total forest sink in 1990-2007 (2.66 gigatonnes of carbon)(9) or China's land carbon sink in 2000-2009 (2.6 gigatonnes of carbon)(10).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据