4.8 Article

Competition between DNA methylation and transcription factors determines binding of NRF1

期刊

NATURE
卷 528, 期 7583, 页码 575-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature16462

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis Research Foundation
  2. European Union (NoE 'EpiGeneSys') [FP7-HEALTH-2010-257082]
  3. European Union ('Blueprint' consortium) [FP7-282510]
  4. European Research Council (EpiGePlas)
  5. Swiss initiative in Systems Biology (RTD Cell Plasticity)
  6. EMBO postdoctoral long-term fellowships
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) are key determinants of gene activity, yet they bind only a fraction of their corresponding DNA sequence motifs in any given cell type(1). Chromatin has the potential to restrict accessibility of binding sites; however, in which context chromatin states are instructive for TF binding remains mainly unknown(1,2). To explore the contribution of DNA methylation to constrained TF binding, we mapped DNase-I-hypersensitive sites in murine stem cells in the presence and absence of DNA methylation. Methylation-restricted sites are enriched for TF motifs containing CpGs, especially for those of NRF1. In fact, the TF NRF1 occupies several thousand additional sites in the unmethylated genome, resulting in increased transcription. Restoring de novo methyltransferase activity initiates remethylation at these sites and outcompetes NRF1 binding. This suggests that binding of DNA-methylation-sensitive TFs relies on additional determinants to induce local hypomethylation. In support of this model, removal of neighbouring motifs in cis or of a TF in trans causes local hypermethylation and subsequent loss of NRF1 binding. This competition between DNA methylation and TFs in vivo reveals a case of cooperativity between TFs that acts indirectly via DNA methylation. Methylation removal by methylation-insensitive factors enables occupancy of methylation-sensitive factors, a principle that rationalizes hypomethylation of regulatory regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据