4.6 Article

Electrical conduction processes in ZnO in a wide temperature range 20-500 K

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 110, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3638120

关键词

-

资金

  1. Taiwan National Science Council [NSC 99-2120-M-009-001]
  2. MOE ATU
  3. Chinese Ministry of Education [109042]
  4. NSF of Tianjin City [10JCYBJC02400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated the electrical conduction processes in as-grown and thermally cycled ZnO single crystal as well as as-grown ZnO polycrystalline films over the wide temperature range 20-500 K. In the case of ZnO single crystal between 110 and 500 K, two types of thermal activation conduction processes are observed. This is explained in terms of the existence of both shallow donors and intermediately deep donors that are consecutively excited to the conduction band as the temperature increases. By measuring the resistivity rho(T) of a given single crystal after repeated thermal cycling in vacuum, we demonstrate that oxygen vacancies play an important role in governing the shallow donor concentrations but leave the activation energy (similar or equal to 27 +/- 2 meV) largely intact. In the case of polycrystalline films, two types of thermal activation conduction processes are also observed between similar to 150 and 500 K. Below similar to 150 K, we found an additional conductionprocess due to the nearest-neighbor-hopping conduction mechanism, which takes place in the shallow impurity band. As the temperature further decreases below similar to 80 K, a crossover to the Mott variable-range-hopping conduction process is observed. Taken together with our previous measurements on rho(T) of ZnO polycrystalline films in the temperature range 2-100 K [Y. L. Huang et al., J. Appl. Phys. 107, 063715 (2010)], this work establishes a quite complete picture of the overall electrical conduction mechanisms in the ZnO material from liquid-helium temperatures up to 500 K. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3638120]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据