4.6 Article

Depth analysis of subgap electronic states in amorphous oxide semiconductor, a-In-Ga-Zn-O, studied by hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 109, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3560769

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a previous work, we examined subgap states in highly doped amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O (a-IGZO) films by hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HX-PES) and found they had subgap electronic states above the valence band maximum (VBM) with the densities > 5 x 10(20) cm(-3) and just below the Fermi level with the densities > 5 x 10(19) cm(-3) [K. Nomura, T. Kamiya, H. Yanagi, E. Ikenaga, K. Yang, K. Kobayashi, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 202117 (2008)]; however, their electron densities (N-e > 3 x 10(19) cm(-3)) are rather high and not compatible with rational properties required for active channel layers in thin-film transistors (TFTs). In this work, we report the effects of N-e and thermal annealing on the subgap states in order to provide the data useful for actual TFTs. It was found that the low-N-e a-IGZO films had extra subgap states above VBM similar to the previous report, but their densities were as small as similar to 2.0 x 10(20) cm(-3) for the highly resistive, wet-annealed a-IGZO films. Angle-dependent HX-PES revealed that the subgap states above VBM concentrate in the surface region. The O 1s peak indicated that the wet annealing suppressed the generation of subgap states by terminating these states with -OH bonds. The subgap states below E-F were observed commonly in all the samples including ZnO, crystalline (c-) IGZO and a-IGZO. It is concluded that these states below E-F are neither related to the disordered structures of a-IGZO nor to their TFT characteristics. It is considered that these states are related to the metastable states created by the high-energy photons in vacuum. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3560769]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据