4.8 Article

Human gut Bacteroidetes can utilize yeast mannan through a selfish mechanism

期刊

NATURE
卷 517, 期 7533, 页码 165-U86

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature13995

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [322820]
  2. Wellcome Trust [WT097907AIA]
  3. BBSRC [BB/G016127/1]
  4. US Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Research Center (BESC) - Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science
  5. National Institutes of Health [GM090080]
  6. University of Michigan Medical School Host Microbiome Initiative
  7. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  8. AgriFlex [2510]
  9. Canadian Institute of Health Research operating grant [MOP-68913]
  10. Australian Research Council
  11. Mizutani Foundation
  12. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G016127/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. BBSRC [BB/G016127/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yeasts, which have been a component of the human diet for at least 7,000 years, possess an elaborate cell wall alpha-mannan. The influence of yeast mannan on the ecology of the human microbiota is unknown. Here we show that yeast alpha-mannan is a viable food source for the Gram-negative bacterium Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, a dominant member of the microbiota. Detailed biochemical analysis and targeted gene disruption studies support a model whereby limited cleavage of alpha-mannan on the surface generates large oligosaccharides that are subsequently depolymerized to mannose by the action of periplasmic enzymes. Co-culturing studies showed that metabolism of yeast mannan by B. thetaiotaomicron presents a 'selfish' model for the catabolism of this difficult to breakdown polysaccharide. Genomic comparison with B. thetaiotaomicron in conjunction with cell culture studies show that a cohort of highly successful members of the microbiota has evolved to consume sterically-restricted yeast glycans, an adaptation that may reflect the incorporation of eukaryotic microorganisms into the human diet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据