4.8 Article

Super-enhancers delineate disease-associated regulatory nodes in T cells

期刊

NATURE
卷 520, 期 7548, 页码 558-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature14154

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Wellcome Trust [105663/Z/14/Z]
  2. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Royal Society [105663/Z/14/Z]
  3. Intramural Research Program of NIAMS
  4. NCI [R01 CA186714]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhancers regulate spatiotemporal gene expression and impart cellspecific transcriptional outputs that drive cell identity'. Super-enhancers (SEs), also known as stretch-enhancers, are a subset of enhancers especially important for genes associated with cell identity and genetic risk of disease(2-6). CD4(+) T cells are critical for host defence and autoimmunity. Here we analysed maps of mouse T-cell SEs as a non-biased means of identifying key regulatory nodes involved in cell specification. We found that cytokines and cytokine receptors were the dominant class of genes exhibiting SE architecture in T cells. Nonetheless, the locus encoding Bach2, a key negative regulator of effector differentiation, emerged as the most prominent T-cell SE, revealing a network in which SE-associated genes critical for T-cell biology are repressed by BACH2. Disease-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms for immune-mediated disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, were highly enriched for T-cell SEs versus typical enhancers or SEs in other cell lineages'. Intriguingly, treatment of T cells with the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor tofacitinib disproportionately altered the expression of rheumatoid arthritis risk genes with SE structures. Together, these results indicate that genes with SE architecture in T cells encompass a variety of cytokines and cytokine receptors but are controlled by a 'guardian' transcription factor, itself endowed with an SE. Thus, enumeration of SEs allows the unbiased determination of key regulatory nodes in T cells, which are preferentially modulated by pharmacological intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据