4.6 Article

Fundamental study of mechanical energy harvesting using piezoelectric nanostructures

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 108, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3462468

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-0905914]
  2. Division Of Materials Research
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0905914] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper numerically estimates the potential, the output power and the energy conversion efficiency of piezoelectric nanostructures, including rectangular nanowires (NWs), hexagonal NWs, and two-dimensional vertical thin films (the nanofins). Static analysis studies the maximum piezoelectric potential that can be produced by a BaTiO3 NW, a ZnO NW, and a ZnO nanofin when they are subjected to a constant external force. Dynamic analysis is performed to study the power generation ability via the vibration of these nanostructures agitated by ambient vibration energy. ZnO NW and nanofin are selected as two representative nanogenerator elements. Their dynamic responses are modeled using a single-degree of freedom system with a series of damping ratios. Combining the transfer functions of mechanical vibration and piezoelectric charge generation, we define the output power and efficiencies as functions of the vibration frequency and the sizes. The optimal size for constructing a high efficiency and high-power nanogenerator is suggested. The material dependence of a dynamic system is also studied based on different piezoelectric and ferroelectric material systems, including ZnO, BaTiO3, and (1-x) Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O-3-xPbTiO(3). This research reveals a comprehensive relationship between the mechanical energy harvesting ability and the nanomaterials' morphologies, dimensions, and properties. It provides a guideline for the design of high-power nanogenerators and the development of piezoelectric nanodevices in general. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3462468]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据