4.8 Article

Graphene kirigami

期刊

NATURE
卷 524, 期 7564, 页码 204-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature14588

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cornell Center for Materials Research (National Science Foundation, NSF) [DMR-1120296]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0749]
  3. Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science
  4. NSF [ECCS-0335765]
  5. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1144153, DGE-0707428]
  6. SBIR [DE-SC0011385]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For centuries, practitioners of origami ('ori', fold; 'kami', paper) and kirigami ('kiru', cut) have fashioned sheets of paper into beautiful and complex three-dimensional structures. Both techniques are scalable, and scientists and engineers are adapting them to different two-dimensional starting materials to create structures from the macro-to the microscale(1,2). Here we show that graphene(3-6) is well suited for kirigami, allowing us to build robust microscale structures with tunable mechanical properties. The material parameter crucial for kirigami is the Foppl-von Karman number(7,8) gamma: an indication of the ratio between in-plane stiffness and out-of-plane bending stiffness, with high numbers corresponding to membranes that more easily bend and crumple than they stretch and shear. To determine gamma, we measure the bending stiffness of graphene monolayers that are 10-100 micrometres in size and obtain a value that is thousands of times higher than the predicted atomic-scale bending stiffness. Interferometric imaging attributes this finding to ripples in the membrane(9-13) that stiffen the graphene sheets considerably, to the extent that gamma is comparable to that of a standard piece of paper. We may therefore apply ideas from kirigami to graphene sheets to build mechanical metamaterials such as stretchable electrodes, springs, and hinges. These results establish graphene kirigami as a simple yet powerful and customizable approach for fashioning one-atom-thick graphene sheets into resilient and movable parts with microscale dimensions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据