4.6 Article

Hard graphitelike hydrogenated amorphous carbon grown at high rates by a remote plasma

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 107, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3273412

关键词

amorphous state; annealing; carbon; hydrogen; hydrogenation; infrared spectra; plasma chemistry; plasma CVD; refractive index; thin films

资金

  1. Materials Innovation Institute M2i [M41.3.08305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogenated amorphous carbon (a-C:H) deposited from an Ar-C2H2 expanding thermal plasma chemical vapor deposition (ETP-CVD) is reported. The downstream plasma region of an ETP is characterized by a low electron temperature (similar to 0.3 eV), which leads to an ion driven chemistry and negligible physical effects, such as ion bombardment (ion energy < 2 eV) on the depositing surface. The material properties in ETP-CVD can be controlled by varying the plasma chemistry. In this article we investigate the change in a-C:H material properties by varying the Ar/C2H2 gas flow ratio over a wide range (1.33-150), with emphasis on low gas flow ratios (1.33-5). By changing the Ar/C2H2 gas flow ratio, the gas residence time in the ETP expansion can be tuned, which in turn defines the chemistry of the ETP-CVD. Soft polymerlike a-C:H to moderately hard a-C:H films have been deposited by lowering the Ar/C2H2 gas flow ratio. Recently, under very low Ar/C2H2 gas flow ratios, a hard graphitelike a-C:H material has been deposited. The striking feature of this material is the infrared absorption spectrum in the C - H-x stretching region (2800-3100 cm(-1)), which is a distinct narrow bimodal spectrum evolving from a broad spectrum for the moderately hard a-C:H. This transition was attributed to the absence of end groups (sp(2) CH2 and sp(3) CH3), which favors an enhanced cross-linking in the film in a similar effect to elevated ion bombardment or annealing. Moreover, the hard graphitelike film has an increased refractive index (n) as high as 2.5 at 633 nm with a corresponding mass density of similar to 2.0 g/cm(3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据