4.8 Article

Polarized endosome dynamics by spindle asymmetry during asymmetric cell division

期刊

NATURE
卷 528, 期 7581, 页码 280-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature16443

关键词

-

资金

  1. Human Frontier Science Program
  2. Marie-Curie Intra-European Fellowship
  3. Departement de l'Instruction Publique of the Canton of Geneva
  4. SNF
  5. SystemsX epiPhysX program
  6. NCCR Chemical Biology program
  7. ERC
  8. Polish-Swiss research programs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During asymmetric division, fate determinants at the cell cortex segregate unequally into the two daughter cells. It has recently been shown that Sara (Smad anchor for receptor activation) signalling endosomes in the cytoplasm also segregate asymmetrically during asymmetric division(1,2). Biased dispatch of Sara endosomes mediates asymmetric Notch/Delta signalling during the asymmetric division of sensory organ precursors in Drosophila(1). In flies, this has been generalized to stem cells in the gut(3) and the central nervous system(1), and, in zebrafish, to neural precursors of the spinal cord(4). However, the mechanism of asymmetric endosome segregation is not understood. Here we show that the plus-end kinesin motor Klp98A targets Sara endosomes to the central spindle, where they move bidirectionally on an antiparallel array of microtubules. The microtubule depolymerizing kinesin Klp10A and its antagonist Patronin generate central spindle asymmetry. This asymmetric spindle, in turn, polarizes endosome motility, ultimately causing asymmetric endosome dispatch into one daughter cell. We demonstrate this mechanism by inverting the polarity of the central spindle by polar targeting of Patronin using nanobodies (single-domain antibodies). This spindle inversion targets the endosomes to the wrong cell. Our data uncover the molecular and physical mechanism by which organelles localized away from the cellular cortex can be dispatched asymmetrically during asymmetric division.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据