4.8 Article

A temporal shift in the circuits mediating retrieval of fear memory

期刊

NATURE
卷 519, 期 7544, 页码 460-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature14030

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01-MH058883, P50-MH086400]
  2. University of Puerto Rico President's Office
  3. MBRS-RISE Program [R25-GM061838]
  4. NSF [DBI-0115825]
  5. RCMI [8G12-MD007600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fear memories allow animals to avoid danger, thereby increasing their chances of survival. Fear memories can be retrieved long after learning(1,2), but little is known about how retrieval circuits change with time(3,4). Here we show that the dorsal midline thalamus of rats is required for the retrieval of auditory conditioned fear at late (24 hours, 7 days, 28 days), but not early (0.5 hours, 6 hours) time points after learning. Consistent with this, the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT), a subregion of the dorsal midline thalamus, showed increased c-Fos expression only at late time points, indicating that the PVT is gradually recruited for fear retrieval. Accordingly, the conditioned tone responses of PVTneurons increased with time after training. The prelimbic (PL) prefrontal cortex, which is necessary for fear retrieval(5-7), sends dense projections to the PVT8. Retrieval at late time points activated PL neurons projecting to the PVT, and optogenetic silencing of these projections impaired retrieval at late, but not early, time points. In contrast, silencing of PL inputs to the basolateral amygdala impaired retrieval at early, but not late, time points, indicating a time-dependent shift in retrieval circuits. Retrieval at late time points also activated PVT neurons projecting to the central nucleus of the amygdala, and silencing these projections at late, but not early, time points induced a persistent attenuation of fear. Thus, the PVT may act as a crucial thalamic node recruited into cortico-amygdalar networks for retrieval and maintenance of long-term fear memories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据