4.6 Article

Observation of hole hopping via dopant in MoOx-doped organic semiconductors: Mechanism analysis and application for high performance organic light-emitting devices

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 107, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3428374

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [20921061]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50973104, 60906020]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2009CB623604, 2009CB930603]
  4. Foundation of Jilin Research Council [20080337, 20090127]
  5. Foundation of Changchun Research Council [2007GH06]
  6. State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, Jilin University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conduction mechanism in molybdenum trioxide (MoOx)-doped hole- and electron-type organic semiconductors is investigated. The used hole-transporting materials are N, N'-diphenyl-N, N'-bis (1-naphthylphenyl)-1, 1'-biphen4, 4'-diamine, 4',4-tri(N-carbazolyl)triphenylamine, 4, 4'-N, N-dicarbazole-biphenyl, and pentacene and the used electron-transporting material is (8-quinolinolato) aluminum (Alq(3)). It can be seen that the hole conductivity is significantly enhanced upon MoOx doping, and more importantly, dominant hole current could be realized in a typical electron-transport material Alq(3) by doping MoOx. Hence, high efficiency organic light-emitting devices can also be achieved even using MoOx-doped Alq3 film as hole transporting layer. The mechanism investigation indicates that the MoOx plays an important role in the hole transport. It is showed that the MoOx serves as the hole hopping sites, whereas the used organic materials serve as the transport medium and determine the magnitude of transport current. Furthermore, it is found that doping MoOx into the organic materials also reduces the energy and position disorders of the doped organic films, which are well demonstrated by the study on transport characteristics of the doped films at various temperatures. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3428374]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据