4.6 Article

Nanostructures and defects in thermoelectric AgPb18SbTe20 single crystal

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 105, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3124364

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Science [DE-AC02-98CH10886, DE-FC26-04NT42278]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticles play key roles in reducing thermal conductivity, and hence increasing figure of merit for many thermoelectric materials. We have studied the structure of AgPb18SbTe20 (LAST-18) using high resolution imaging, nanoelectron diffraction, energy dispersive spectrum, and electron energy loss spectrum, and observed a range of nanoparticles with different sizes (from less than 1 nm to more than 10 nm) and shape (sphere, ellipse, square, etc.). The lattice parameters of the nanoparticles have a wide range from 0.601 to 0.655 nm, while those of the matrix have a range from 0.633 to 0.646 nm. The nanoparticles are formed due to the ordering of Pb and Ag-Sb. There are four ordered structures with primitive cubic, primitive tetragonal (T1, a approximate to a(0)/root 2, c approximate to a(0), here, a(0) is the lattice parameter of the rocksalt-type matrix), primitive tetragonal (T2, a approximate to a(0)/root 2, c approximate to 2a(0)), and body-centered tetragonal (T3, a approximate to a(0)/root 2, c approximate to 3a(0)) lattices, respectively. Antiphase domains, twins, and phase separations were often observed in the nanoparticles. The strain field in the surrounding matrix due to the presence of nanoparticles was retrieved from the high resolution images. The characteristic that the strain field is anisotropic and extends to large area is considered to enhance the scattering of the phonons. The results provide quantitative structure information about nanoparticles, that is essential for the understanding of the origin of the high thermoelectric performance in this class of materials. (C) 2009 American Institute of Physics. [DOI: 10.1063/1.3124364]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据