4.6 Article

Structural properties of wurtzitelike ScGaN films grown by NH3-molecular beam epitaxy

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 106, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3268466

关键词

compressive strength; dislocations; gallium compounds; III-V semiconductors; lattice constants; MOCVD; sapphire; scandium compounds; segregation; semiconductor growth; semiconductor thin films; stacking faults; stress relaxation; transmission electron microscopy; vapour phase epitaxial growth; wide band gap semiconductors; X-ray diffraction

资金

  1. EPSRC
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [EP/EC035167/1]
  3. START Program [Y371]
  4. EPSRC [TS/G001383/1, EP/H019324/1, EP/E035167/1, EP/G042330/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y 371] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G042330/1, TS/G001383/1, EP/H019324/1, EP/E035167/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y371] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scandium gallium nitride (ScxGa1-xN) alloy films with low Sc concentrations (up to approximately x=0.08) were grown using molecular beam epitaxy with NH3 as a reactive N source, on GaN films that were grown on sapphire using metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE). High-resolution x-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy revealed that both the c and the a lattice parameters increased with increasing Sc concentration, as predicted for a wurtzite-structure alloy. As the Sc content increased, the relaxation of the compressive stress in the ScxGa1-xN films occurred mainly via the introduction of additional a-type dislocations, but neither stacking faults nor significant compositional segregation was observed at any composition. A dewetting effect (which increased with increasing Sc content) was observed in MOVPE-grown GaN deposited on top of the ScxGa1-xN films, but the ScxGa1-xN remained compositionally and structurally stable under GaN growth conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据