4.6 Article

Plasma-assisted atomic layer deposition of TiN/Al2O3 stacks for metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 106, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3267299

关键词

aluminium compounds; atomic layer deposition; dielectric hysteresis; electric breakdown; insulating thin films; leakage currents; MOS capacitors; permittivity; Rutherford backscattering; stoichiometry; titanium compounds; transmission electron microscopy; tunnelling; Weibull distribution

资金

  1. Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs [IS 044041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By employing plasma-assisted atomic layer deposition, thin films of Al2O3 and TiN are subsequently deposited in a single reactor at a single substrate temperature with the objective of fabricating high-quality TiN/Al2O3/p-Si metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors. Transmission electron microscopy and Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy analyses show well-defined interfaces and good Al2O3 stoichiometry, respectively. Electrical investigation of as-deposited test structures demonstrates leakage current densities as low as similar to 1 nA/cm(2). Current-voltage (I-V) measurements demonstrate clear Fowler-Nordheim tunneling with an average TiN/Al2O3 barrier height of 3.3 eV. Steep Weibull distributions of the breakdown electric field around 7.5 MV/cm indicate good reliability of these devices. Time-dependent dielectric breakdown measurements demonstrate that the devices can sustain high operating electric fields of 3-4 MV/cm for the 10 year lifetime criterion. From capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements, a dielectric constant (k) of 8.7 +/- 0.1 was extracted for the Al2O3. No direct dependence on the deposition temperature was found in the range 350-400 degrees C, although the stack deposited at 400 degrees C demonstrates significantly lower C-V hysteresis of similar to 50 mV. A negative fixed oxide charge density of (9.6 +/- 0.2)x10(12) cm(-2) was found to be present at the Al2O3/p-Si interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据