4.6 Article

Predictions of thermal boundary conductance for systems of disordered solids and interfaces

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 106, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.3267496

关键词

electronic density of states; interface phonons; surface scattering; thermal conductivity

资金

  1. Harry S. Truman Fellowship Program through the LDRD Program Office at Sandia National Laboratories
  2. United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As microsystems grow in their complexity, the number of material layers increases even as the thickness of these layers decreases. As a consequence, energetic transport through material intersections, the so-called thermal boundary conductance (TBC), becomes a greater contributor to the total thermal response of the system as a whole. Consequently, methods are sought that allow for insight into the mechanisms determining the efficiency of this transport, while simultaneously providing predictions with minimal computational investiture. In response, the current study extends the often employed diffuse mismatch model (DMM) to account for disorder that is frequently present in the materials making up the interface as well as the boundary itself. By applying assumptions regarding the scattering rates and mean free paths of phonons within a disordered solid, the resulting modifications of the spectral density of states induce changes in both the number and ratio of forward scattered phonons incident on a surface, and hence predictions of the TBC. Combining these assumptions with an accounting of the distance over which disorder persists, the newly implemented disorder DMM (delta-DMM) is shown to be more capable of predicting the TBC over a range of temperatures and material systems. Additionally, the model demonstrates that TBC is dependent on not only on the material properties but also on the morphology of these materials and the nature of their union.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据