4.6 Article

Glutamate decarboxylase activity and gamma-aminobutyric acid content in Synechocystis sp PCC 6803 under osmotic stress and different carbon sources

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 2327-2333

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-014-0259-9

关键词

Glutamate decarboxylase; GABA; Synechocystis; Osmotic stress; Carbon source; Transcript levels

资金

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University
  2. 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund
  3. Commission on Higher Education, Thailand
  4. Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund of Chulalongkorn University, for the National Research University Project grant [FW0659A]
  5. [RES560530052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), a pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-dependent enzyme, catalyzes the conversion of glutamate to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) through irreversible decarboxylation reaction. In the present study, GAD activity and GABA content in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 were investigated in response to osmotic stress and various carbon sources. The highest GAD activity was detected in late log phase cells subjected to 24 h of osmotic stress by 50 mM NaCl and 100 mM sorbitol with a 2- and 5.5-fold increase in the enzyme activity, respectively. GABA content was found to be enhanced by osmotic stress induced by both sorbitol and NaCl. GAD activity was increased by fourfold when late log phase cells were grown mixotrophically for 24 h in medium containing 0.1 % glucose as carbon source, whereas a nearly fivefold increase in GABA content was observed under the same condition. The increase in GAD activity by osmotic stress induced by NaCl and sorbitol up to 50 and 100 mM, respectively, and glucose was also corroborated by the increase in the levels of gad transcripts. Our results suggest that GAD activity, GABA content, and transcription of the gene-encoding GAD in Synechocystis cells are affected by alternative carbon sources as well as osmotic stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据